{"id":30199,"date":"2018-03-29T12:42:14","date_gmt":"2018-03-29T16:42:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blog.genealogybank.com\/?p=30199"},"modified":"2019-07-17T14:20:52","modified_gmt":"2019-07-17T18:20:52","slug":"was-your-ancestor-missed-on-the-u-s-federal-census","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.genealogybank.com\/blog\/was-your-ancestor-missed-on-the-u-s-federal-census.html","title":{"rendered":"Was Your Ancestor Missed on the U.S. Federal Census?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Introduction<\/em><\/strong>: In this article, Mary Harrell-Sesniak tackles one of the most frustrating of genealogy brick walls: why is it that, even though you know you have the right location and year, you cannot find your ancestor listed on the U.S. Federal Census? Mary is a genealogist, author and editor with a strong technology background.<\/em><\/p>\n

Next time you ponder why an ancestor cannot be located in a particular set of U.S. Census records<\/a>, consider this: even though you may have the correct location and year, your ancestor could have been overlooked. That may have been due to simple oversight \u2013 or perhaps negligence or intentional fraud.<\/p>\n

\"An<\/a>
Plain Dealer (Cleveland, Ohio), 18 June 1890, page 4<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

To illustrate, let\u2019s look at the mostly lost 1890 United States Federal Census. In January of 1921, while stored in the Commerce Building in Washington, D.C., about 3\/4 of this census was ruined from a fire, water and smoke. Later it was ordered to be destroyed.<\/p>\n

All that remain are fragments. Family historians have long rued that event, and thus I looked to newspapers to see if the rumor that many people were not counted in that census was actually true.<\/p>\n

Simple Oversight<\/strong><\/p>\n

Was simple oversight a reason?<\/p>\n

Turns out there was concern that many people were out of town and missed the count \u2013 especially traveling salesmen. This Georgia newspaper article points out another reason: landlords and landladies, who weren\u2019t working from registers, might have been remiss in which tenants they reported.<\/p>\n

\"An<\/a>
Macon Telegraph (Macon, Georgia), 15 June 1890, page 5<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Negligence<\/strong><\/p>\n

Negligence is commonly alleged for missing records \u2013 and we see a number of challenges made to the tallies.<\/p>\n

The most widely published report came from the mayor of St. Louis, who felt that there was substantial negligence on the part of the enumerators. The local office disputed this claim, reporting that 99% was correct.<\/p>\n

\"An<\/a>
Charlotte News (Charlotte, North Carolina), 4 July 1890, page 4<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Note:<\/em><\/strong> Even if we accept that the figure of 99% accuracy is correct, 1% of errors on the 11th Federal Census is substantial. St. Louis\u2019s population in 1890 was about 450,000, so a 1% error rate would result in over 4,500 mistakes. Extrapolate that to the overall United States population at 62,979,766 in 1890, and perhaps there were as many as 600,000 errors in the 1890 U.S. Federal Census.<\/p>\n

Intentional Fraud<\/strong><\/p>\n

To examine this charge, consider the often-overlooked uses of the census — one being to price investments based upon population counts.<\/p>\n

An Ohio newspaper article noted that by manipulating population totals, the value of municipal bonds would change by as much as 25%.<\/p>\n

\"An<\/a>
Cleveland Leader (Cleveland, Ohio), 20 July 1890, page 4<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Resolutions<\/strong><\/p>\n

What efforts were made to get the count right?<\/p>\n

Many areas advertised to get citizens involved if they felt they were not counted. Names were then submitted after the fact to the Census Bureau \u2013 and the New York Herald<\/em> went so far as to publish a submission form.<\/p>\n

\"An<\/a>
New York Herald (New York, New York), 7 November 1890, page 4<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Have you had success finding your ancestors in the U.S. Federal Census? If so, tell us your stories in the comments section below. And if not, perhaps your ancestor was left off the census for one of the reasons described above.<\/p>\n

Related Articles:<\/strong><\/p>\n