{"id":56195,"date":"2020-02-13T11:56:44","date_gmt":"2020-02-13T16:56:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blog.genealogybank.com\/?p=56195"},"modified":"2020-03-30T13:17:31","modified_gmt":"2020-03-30T17:17:31","slug":"would-valentines-day-in-1916-give-women-the-vote","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.genealogybank.com\/blog\/would-valentines-day-in-1916-give-women-the-vote.html","title":{"rendered":"Would Valentine\u2019s Day in 1916 Give Women the Vote?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Introduction:<\/em><\/strong> In this article, Jane Hampton Cook writes about a tactic used by suffragists in 1916: sending valentines to politicians urging support for women\u2019s suffrage. Jane, the former White House webmaster for President George W. Bush, is a presidential historian and the author of nine historical books. She is a consultant for the Women\u2019s Suffrage Centennial Commission.<\/em> Her works can be found at janecook.com<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

The year 2020 marks the 100th anniversary of women winning the right to vote. From commemorative coins issued by the U.S. Treasury Department to special exhibits at museums, you will no doubt hear about women\u2019s suffrage in the coming year.<\/p>\n

By 1916 the women\u2019s suffragist lobby, called the Congressional Union, was increasingly frustrated with members of Congress and President Woodrow Wilson for failing to support a national amendment giving women the right to vote. Only four million women had the right to vote in a handful of Western states. Twenty million women were disenfranchised.<\/p>\n

Holding the party in power responsible, these Western women voters sent a message in the 1914 midterms by voting out more than 20 Western members of Congress for failing to vote on the national amendment giving all women in all states the right to vote. Even with this success, by the winter of 1916, suffragists were frustrated because members of the House of Representatives had not voted the national amendment out of committee.<\/p>\n

\"Photo:<\/a>
Photo: text of a suffrage valentine sent to Rep. Edward Pou (D), North Carolina\u2019s 4th congressional district.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

What could the suffragists do? The Congressional Union suffragists got creative. As Inez Haynes Irwin wrote in her 1921 book The Story of the Woman\u2019s Party<\/em>:<\/p>\n

\u201cOn Valentine\u2019s Day, 1916, a thousand valentines were dispatched to Senators and Representatives by members of the Congressional Union living in their districts; the President and Vice-President were not forgotten.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

You can learn more and see some of these valentines if you do an advanced search in GenealogyBank\u2019s Historical Newspaper Archives<\/a>. Use the keywords \u201cValentine Suffrage\u201d or \u201cValentine Suffrage Wilson\u201d from 02-14-1916 to 02-15-1916 to see the results. Here are some examples.<\/p>\n

\"An<\/a>
Trenton Evening Times (Trenton, New Jersey), 14 February 1916, page 4<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

President Wilson\u2019s heart-shaped valentine was a foot high. Here is that valentine the suffragists sent him:<\/p>\n

\"An<\/a>
Kalamazoo Gazette (Kalamazoo, Michigan), 15 February 1916, page 8<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Members of Congress couldn\u2019t be jealous because they were not left out.<\/p>\n

The Wilkes-Barre<\/em> Times-Leader<\/em> published the valentine received by Rep. Henry of Texas, who chaired the House Rules Committee that had yet to vote on the amendment (which was named after Susan B. Anthony). Henry\u2019s valentine was an acrostic.<\/p>\n

\"An<\/a>
Wilkes-Barre Times-Leader (Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania), 14 February 1916, page 4<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Irwin again:<\/p>\n

\u201cRecalcitrant politicians were especially favored. The Rules Committee, for instance, were showered.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Rep. Pou, whose name was pronounced Pew, received a poem with a familiar vibe:<\/p>\n

\u201cThe rose is red,
\nThe violet\u2019s blue,
\nBut VOTES are better
\nMr. Pou\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The suffragists\u2019 message was simple. If members of Congress passed the suffrage measure with a \u201cyeah,\u201d they would reap the benefits on election day.<\/p>\n

Unfortunately, the House Rules Committee decided to wait until after the 1916 election to take a vote on women\u2019s suffrage. Politics trumped votes on Valentine\u2019s Day in 1916.<\/p>\n

What would the suffragists do next? Some would soon turn to more militant efforts. Their tactics would make sensational headlines. More to come\u2026<\/p>\n

Note:<\/em><\/strong> Because the women\u2019s suffrage movement started in 1848 and stretched for more than 72 years, a fun way to enhance your research in Genealogybank\u2019s Historical Newspaper Archives<\/a> is to search for news articles related to women\u2019s suffrage.<\/p>\n

Related Article:<\/strong><\/p>\n