{"id":65569,"date":"2021-03-12T11:16:31","date_gmt":"2021-03-12T16:16:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blog.genealogybank.com\/?p=65569"},"modified":"2021-03-17T11:10:21","modified_gmt":"2021-03-17T15:10:21","slug":"colonial-massachusetts-paternity-cases-the-endicott-story-part-ii","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.genealogybank.com\/blog\/colonial-massachusetts-paternity-cases-the-endicott-story-part-ii.html","title":{"rendered":"Colonial Massachusetts Paternity Cases: The Endicott Story, Part II"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong><em>Introduction:<\/em><\/strong><em> In this article, Melissa Davenport Berry continues showing how paternity cases affected life in the 17th century Massachusetts Bay Colony, concluding her description of the case of the Endicott family. Melissa is a genealogist who has a blog, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ancestoryarchives.com\/\" class=\"broken_link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">AnceStory Archives<\/a>, and a Facebook group, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/groups\/HistoryGenNEFamilies\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">New England Family Genealogy and History<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Today I continue with the drama of the Zerubbabel Endicott paternity case of Salem, Massachusetts, found in the \u201cRecords and Files of the Quarterly Courts of Essex County, Volume 1,\u201d online at the <a href=\"http:\/\/salem.lib.virginia.edu\/Essex\/index.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">University of Virginia<\/a>.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_65573\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-65573\" style=\"width: 927px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.genealogybank.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/illustration-0312-2021-puritan-punishments.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-65573\" src=\"https:\/\/www.genealogybank.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/illustration-0312-2021-puritan-punishments.jpg\" alt=\"Illustration: in addition to fines and whippings, the Puritans used public shame as a form of punishment to humiliate the offenders\" width=\"927\" height=\"571\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.genealogybank.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/illustration-0312-2021-puritan-punishments.jpg 927w, https:\/\/www.genealogybank.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/illustration-0312-2021-puritan-punishments-300x185.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.genealogybank.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/illustration-0312-2021-puritan-punishments-768x473.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 927px) 100vw, 927px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-65573\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Illustration: in addition to fines and whippings, the Puritans used public shame as a form of punishment to humiliate the offenders. The most famous example is Nathaniel Hawthorne\u2019s character Hester Prynne in \u201cThe Scarlet Letter,\u201d whose punishment was to wear a large red \u201cA\u201d for the sin of adultery. The badge of shame for Elizabeth Dew was the paper on her forehead. Credit: illustrations from Frank Hazenplug, published in \u201cFrom Curious Punishments of Bygone Days\u201d by Alice Morse Earle, 1896.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>To recap, Zerubbabel \u2013 the 18-year-old son of Governor John Endicott \u2013 was named in June 1654 by Elizabeth Dew, a maid servant in the Endicott household, as the <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.genealogybank.com\/colonial-massachusetts-paternity-cases-the-endicott-story.html\">father of her illegitimate child<\/a>. The community\u2019s response? Dew was sentenced to be whipped 12 stripes by the constable for her \u201cpernicious lie\u201d against Zerubbabel. The Endicott\u2019s quickly discharged Dew and arranged for her to marry another servant in the house, Cornelius Hulett, on 30 June 1654.<\/p>\n<p>The records also state that Cornelius Hulett was sentenced to be whipped 10 stripes for fornication with Dew before their marriage, \u201chaving confessed before Reverend Edward Norris and others.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>That same year, Zerubbabel married Mary, daughter of Samuel Smith. (They had several children before she died, then he married 2nd Elizabeth (Winthrop) Newman, daughter of Governor John Winthrop and widow of Antipas Newman.)<\/p>\n<p>Despite the hastily-arranged marriage to Hulett, Dew did not withdraw her claims against Zerubbabel, the real daddy. She endured more lashes and public humiliation: in December, the court magistrates enforced a more serious punishment to silence her:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cElizabeth Dew, alias Hulett, wife of Cornelius Hulett, for slanderous speeches against Mr. Zerubbabel Endicott in fathering her child upon him, to be whipped twenty stripes on some lecture day (weather to be more seasonable), a paper to be pinned upon her forehead with this inscription in capital letters: A SLANDERER AGAINST MR. ZERUBBABEL ENDICOTT.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The court testimonies tell a different story.<\/p>\n<p>Dulzebella Bishop (wife of Richard Bishop), and daughter Mary Bishop, gave depositions. They were established members of Salem, and lived near the North River just beyond Beckford Street. Richard Bishop served as a constable and jurist.<\/p>\n<p>The Bishops deposed that Elizabeth Dew, Mrs. Endicott\u2019s maid, came several times to their house on her mistress\u2019s business and complained of Zerubbabel\u2019s \u201cunseemly words and actions.\u201d For example, when she was at the work of lacemaking, he pulled her cushion from her and threw her down on the floor.<\/p>\n<p>Dew also told deponents about going with Benjamin Scarlett (apprentice and servant to Governor John Endicott) and Zerubbabel to the farm via boat, and after going ashore, about two or three poles from the water, Zerubbabel followed her \u2013 and his carriage was such that she told him \u201cI will not be your common baud.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The deponents testified that they asked Dew about Cornelius Hulett, and how he carried himself to her. Dew told them: \u201cHe had never offered me wrong, and not so much as kiss me in all the time he had been in the house.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Then deponents asked Dew why she did not complain to her master. Dew said: \u201cI told Mary Gowen, and she replied, \u2018I know thy condition alas poor wench,\u2019\u201d further stating that Zerubbabel had \u201cinsulted\u201d her also.<\/p>\n<p>The deponents also noted there were other young maids who had confided to them about Zerubbabel\u2019s transgressions against them.<\/p>\n<p>In <em>Founding Mothers &amp; Fathers: Gendered Power and the Forming of American Society<\/em>, Mary Beth Norton believed that the Essex County justices were too quick in determining that Dew\u2019s story was a lie, despite confirmation of Zerubbabel\u2019s past prowling tendencies.<\/p>\n<p>Dew told her story when asked to identify the man who impregnated her, but neither she nor anyone she confided in brought it to light before the time of her court date. Even though the Bishop women were credible witnesses, their testimony was not accepted as truth. Zerubbabel Endicott\u2019s denial was believed, and Dew\u2019s accusation was rejected.<\/p>\n<p>And as far as the Endicott family tree \u2013 the apple (or is that pear?) does not fall far.<\/p>\n<p>Zerubbabel\u2019s son Zerubbabel Jr. is cited in Melinde Lutz Sanborn\u2019s book <em>Lost Babes: Fornication Abstracts from Court Records, Essex County, Massachusetts, 1692-1745<\/em>. In the Court of General Sessions record from 18 January 1692: Zerubbabel Endicott Jr. (husband of Grace Symonds) was presented for adultery with Rebecca (Blake) Eames (wife of Robert Eames). Bound for 200 pounds. Rebecca was accused of witchcraft during the 1692 Salem Witch Trial hysteria, but did not go to the gallows.<\/p>\n<p>While the famous Endicott pear tree (planted c. 1640 and still alive today!) continues to bear fruit, apparently Dew\u2019s illegitimate child did not\u2026 another lost babe of Essex County, and a broken branch in the Endicott line.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_65581\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-65581\" style=\"width: 684px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.genealogybank.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/photo-0312-2021-endicott-pear-tree.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-65581\" src=\"https:\/\/www.genealogybank.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/photo-0312-2021-endicott-pear-tree.jpg\" alt=\"Photo: the famous Endicott pear tree, planted by Governor John Endicott c. 1640\" width=\"684\" height=\"561\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.genealogybank.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/photo-0312-2021-endicott-pear-tree.jpg 684w, https:\/\/www.genealogybank.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/photo-0312-2021-endicott-pear-tree-300x246.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 684px) 100vw, 684px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-65581\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Photo: the famous Endicott pear tree, planted by Governor John Endicott c. 1640. Credit: Ruthie Stearns.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><strong><em>Note:<\/em><\/strong> the photo of the Endicott pear tree shown above was taken in 1965 in Danvers (Old Salem Village), Massachusetts. It shows Anne and Ruthie Stearns (daughters of Rev. Howard Stearns, who was noted for his work on the 1692 witch hysteria, and assisted James Cooper and Ken Minkema in the transcription of Rev. Samuel Parris\u2019 Sermon Notebook project). Read more at <a href=\"https:\/\/bit.ly\/2HMRJio\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Witch Lore in Old Salem Village: Ruthie Stearns\u2019 Family Connections<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Related Articles:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.genealogybank.com\/puritan-court-drama-woman-wont-identify-childs-father.html\">Puritan Court Drama_Woman Won\u2019t Identify Child\u2019s Father<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.genealogybank.com\/puritan-court-drama-woman-wont-identify-childs-father-part-ii.html\">Puritan Court Drama_Woman Won\u2019t Identify Child\u2019s Father, Part II<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.genealogybank.com\/paternity-court-drama-in-17th-century-america.html\">Paternity Court Drama in 17th Century America<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.genealogybank.com\/paternity-court-drama-in-17th-century-america-part-ii.html\">Paternity Court Drama in 17th Century America, Part II<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.genealogybank.com\/paternity-court-drama-in-17th-century-america-part-iii.html\">Paternity Court Drama in 17th Century America, Part III<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.genealogybank.com\/colonial-massachusetts-paternity-cases-the-endicott-story.html\">Colonial Massachusetts Paternity Cases: The Endicott Story<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Melissa Davenport Berry continues showing how paternity cases affected life in Colonial Massachusetts, concluding her story of the Endicott family.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":31,"featured_media":65505,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[12557],"tags":[57847,57845,12,55941,12951,57843],"class_list":["post-65569","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-genealogy-stories","tag-cornelius-hulett","tag-elizabeth-dew","tag-genealogy","tag-john-endicott","tag-massachusetts-bay-colony","tag-zerubbabel-endicott"],"acf":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.genealogybank.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/illustration-0717-2020-featured-graphic-endicott.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.genealogybank.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65569","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.genealogybank.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.genealogybank.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.genealogybank.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/31"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.genealogybank.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=65569"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/www.genealogybank.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65569\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":65587,"href":"https:\/\/www.genealogybank.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65569\/revisions\/65587"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.genealogybank.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/65505"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.genealogybank.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=65569"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.genealogybank.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=65569"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.genealogybank.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=65569"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}